The Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls Protein, Carbohydrates, Fats, Vitamins and Nutrient Values

Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls is a Michigan Dining type of food with 3 Pieces serving size that provides 114 calories. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 79% carbohydrate, and 9% fat, 12% protein in 100 gram of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls nutrient values are 20 g carbohydrate, 3 g protein, and 1 g fat. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has the vitamins A, and C within it. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 0 % vitamin A and 0 % vitamin C. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 201 mg sodium, 52 mg potassium, 0 mg cholesterol, and 0 g trans fat. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 0 g dietary fiber, and 2 g sugar. 1 serving of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls provides 0 % iron, 0 g polyunsaturated and 0 g unsaturated fat along with 0 g saturated fat. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls provides 114g of 2,000 cal by leaving 1,886 cal.

 

Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls and fitness goals such as heart health, daily sodium intake, cholesterol threshold, carb, sugar, and fiber intake are related. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls provides 1g fat for total of 67g. After 1 serving of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls, 66g is needed for heart health. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls provides 201g for 2,300g by leaving 2,099g for daily sodium intake. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls causes –g for the threshold of 300g by leaving 300g cholesterol threshold amount daily.

 

Having a low-carb diet with Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls is one of the possibilities. 20g is provided by Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls for the daily 250g carbohydrates intake for low-carb diet. 1 serving of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls leaves 230g carbohydrates for low-carb dieting. 1 serving of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls provides 2g sugar for daily 75g sugar intake. 1 serving of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls leaves 73g sugar for daily intake threshold of sugar. Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls provides –g fiber for daily 25g fiber by leaving 25g fiber for daily fiber intake.

 

To burn the calories of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls 17 minutes of cycling is needed. Running and cleaning are other activities to burn the calories of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. Thus, 11 minutes of running and 42 minutes of cleaning are necessary to burn the calories of 1 serving of Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls.

 

There are similar foods to the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls in terms of nutrition, daily intake amount, and calorie amount. These are California Sushi Rolls, California Roll, Sushi Rice, Sushi, and Spring Rolls.

 

The nutrients table of the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls with fat, protein, carbohydrate, vitamins A, B, C, D, E, K, and minerals of iron, sodium, calcium, and potassium along with the sugar and fiber amounts are below.

Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls

Nutrient values for Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls

Serving size

3 Pieces

Calories

114

Carbs percentage

79%

Fat percentage

9%

Protein percentage

12%

Carbs

20 g

Dietary fiber

0 g

Sugar

2 g

Fat

1 g

Saturated

0 g

Polyunsaturated

0 g

Monounsaturated

0 g

Trans

0 g

Protein

3 g

Sodium

201 mg

Potassium

52 mg

Cholesterol

0 mg

Vitamin a

0 %

Vitamin c

0 %

Calcium

0 %

Iron

0 %

What are the similar foods to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls?

The similar foods to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls involve alike nutritional values from the same Michigan Dining type such as carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and fatty acid types along with vitamins such as vitamins D, B, C, and A and minerals such as calcium, potassium, and iron. The similar foods to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls are listed below.

  1. Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte is a similar nourishment to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls because both of the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls and Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte are from Michigan Dining. The Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has less calories than Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte because Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 114 calories, and it is 421 less calories than Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte. The Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte has more iron than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls, and more calcium than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. The Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte has more protein than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. To learn more about Michigan Dining – Tiramisu Torte, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  2. Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White is a similar nourishment to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls because both of the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls and Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White are from Michigan Dining. The Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has less calories than Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White because Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 114 calories, and it is 265 less calories than Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White. The Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White has more iron than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls, and more calcium than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. The Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White has more protein than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. To learn more about Michigan Dining – Italian Turkey Burger with Provolone on White, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  3. Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun is a similar nourishment to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls because both of the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls and Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun are from Michigan Dining. The Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has less calories than Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun because Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 114 calories, and it is 210 less calories than Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun. The Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun has more iron than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls, and more calcium than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. The Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun has more protein than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. To learn more about Michigan Dining – Asian Style Burger on White Bun, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  4. Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza is a similar nourishment to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls because both of the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls and Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza are from Michigan Dining. The Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has less calories than Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza because Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 114 calories, and it is 171 less calories than Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza. The Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza has more iron than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls, and more calcium than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. The Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza has more protein than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. To learn more about Michigan Dining – Roasted Potato and Onion Pizza, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  5. Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza is a similar nourishment to Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls because both of the Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls and Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza are from Michigan Dining. The Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has less calories than Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza because Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls has 114 calories, and it is 139 less calories than Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza. The Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza has more iron than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls, and more calcium than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. The Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza has more protein than Michigan Dining – California Sushi Rolls. To learn more about Michigan Dining – Cheese Wheat Pizza, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

Leave a Comment