The Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers Protein, Carbohydrates, Fats, Vitamins and Nutrient Values

Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers is a Gamesa type of food with 3 cookies serving size that provides 170 calories. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers has 50% carbohydrate, and 46% fat, 5% protein in 100 gram of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers nutrient values are 22 g carbohydrate, 2 g protein, and 9 g fat. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers has the vitamins A, and C within it. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers has 0 % vitamin A and 0 % vitamin C. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers has 40 mg sodium, 0 mg potassium, 0 mg cholesterol, and 0 g trans fat. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers has 1 g dietary fiber, and 13 g sugar. 1 serving of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers provides 3 % iron, 0 g polyunsaturated and 0 g unsaturated fat along with 6 g saturated fat. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers provides 170g of 2,000 cal by leaving 1,830 cal.

 

Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers and fitness goals such as heart health, daily sodium intake, cholesterol threshold, carb, sugar, and fiber intake are related. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers provides 9g fat for total of 67g. After 1 serving of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers, 58g is needed for heart health. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers provides 40g for 2,300g by leaving 2,260g for daily sodium intake. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers causes –g for the threshold of 300g by leaving 300g cholesterol threshold amount daily.

 

Having a low-carb diet with Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers is one of the possibilities. 22g is provided by Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers for the daily 250g carbohydrates intake for low-carb diet. 1 serving of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers leaves 228g carbohydrates for low-carb dieting. 1 serving of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers provides 13g sugar for daily 75g sugar intake. 1 serving of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers leaves 62g sugar for daily intake threshold of sugar. Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers provides 1g fiber for daily 25g fiber by leaving 24g fiber for daily fiber intake.

 

To burn the calories of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers 26 minutes of cycling is needed. Running and cleaning are other activities to burn the calories of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. Thus, 17 minutes of running and minutes of cleaning are necessary to burn the calories of 1 serving of Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers.

 

There are similar foods to the Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers in terms of nutrition, daily intake amount, and calorie amount. These are Sugar Wafers, Sugar Wafers, Chocolate Sugar Wafers (2020), Strawberry Sugar Wafers, and Cookies.

 

The nutrients table of the Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers with fat, protein, carbohydrate, vitamins A, B, C, D, E, K, and minerals of iron, sodium, calcium, and potassium along with the sugar and fiber amounts are below.

Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers

Nutrient values for Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers

Serving size

3 cookies

Calories

170

Carbs percentage

50%

Fat percentage

46%

Protein percentage

5%

Carbs

22 g

Dietary fiber

1 g

Sugar

13 g

Fat

9 g

Saturated

6 g

Polyunsaturated

0 g

Monounsaturated

0 g

Trans

0 g

Protein

2 g

Sodium

40 mg

Potassium

0 mg

Cholesterol

0 mg

Vitamin a

0 %

Vitamin c

0 %

Calcium

1 %

Iron

3 %

What are the alternative foods for Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers?

The alternative foods for Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers involve similar nutritional values, such as carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and fatty acid types, along with vitamins such as vitamin D, B, C, and A and minerals such as calcium, potassium, and iron. The best alternative foods to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers are listed below.

  1. Homekist – Cookies is an alternative to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers because it has 170 calories, similar to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Homekist – Cookies has more iron than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers, and more calcium than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Homekist – Cookies has similar protein to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. To learn more about Homekist – Cookies, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  2. Benton’s – Cookies is an alternative to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers because it has 170 calories, similar to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Benton’s – Cookies has more iron than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers, and less calcium than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Benton’s – Cookies has similar protein to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. To learn more about Benton’s – Cookies, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  3. Gamesa – Sugar Wafers is an alternative to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers because it has 170 calories, similar to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Gamesa – Sugar Wafers has similar iron to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers, and similar calcium to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Gamesa – Sugar Wafers has similar protein to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. To learn more about Gamesa – Sugar Wafers, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  4. Gamesa – Strawberry Sugar Wafers is an alternative to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers because it has 170 calories, similar to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Gamesa – Strawberry Sugar Wafers has less iron than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers, and similar calcium to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Gamesa – Strawberry Sugar Wafers has less protein than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. To learn more about Gamesa – Strawberry Sugar Wafers, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

  5. Pepperidge Farm – Milano Milk Chocolate Cookies is an alternative to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers because it has 170 calories, similar to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Pepperidge Farm – Milano Milk Chocolate Cookies has more iron than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers, and more calcium than Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. The Pepperidge Farm – Milano Milk Chocolate Cookies has similar protein to Gamesa – Chocolate Sugar Wafers. To learn more about Pepperidge Farm – Milano Milk Chocolate Cookies, read related food calories, and a nutrition guide.

Leave a Comment